Jewish Burial Law Excuse Unmasked

Disturbing a Jewish grave is against Jewish burial law—except when it isn’t. I have previously written about how there are certain exceptions, like if valuables are believed to have fallen in the grave. Jewish Rabbis have successfully used Jewish burial law to stop proper investigations of alleged mass murder sites. This NBC News article (see image below) reports that an excavation was never conducted at Treblinka because Jews said they couldn’t. We’re not supposed to bat an eye at the fact that there was no proper crime scene investigation at a place where almost a million people were allegedly murdered—all because Jews, who benefit from the Holocaust narrative and would be hurt if it were exposed as a sham, said it breaks their own Jewish rules. Of course, the Allied governments were more than happy to oblige the Jews, as the Holocaust narrative also benefits them and would hurt their credibility if exposed as a lie.

But then a news story comes out which illustrates that “having respect for the victims” was just a great big excuse. From the New York Post:

How convenient that when the mass grave actually exists that they will allow a Jewish body to be exhumed. If you’re a Holocaust believer reading this, you should really try and put away your Holocaust conditioning for a second and think of this like any other crime. Ask yourself this: when else it is ever acceptable for the people accusing someone else of a crime to stop a crime scene investigation from being conducted? Doesn’t this raise alarm bells in your head? It doesn’t matter what the reason or excuse; as a supposedly civilized people, we owe it to the accused to follow proper procedures and seek the truth of the matter, not the desired outcome.

But that’s not the only gift this story has to give. Later on the previously mentioned New York Post article says this about Lt. Nathan Baskind, the Jew that was buried with the Nazis:

He was captured after getting shot and brought to a squalid Luftwaffe hospital in Cherbourg known for its “cesspool” conditions.

Since taking a wounded person to the hospital isn’t evil, David Spector, the author of the article in question and probable Jew, called the place a squalid cesspool in order to conform to the “Nazis are evil” style guide. Even if the hospital was squalid, would it have been better if the Nazis didn’t take Baskind to receive medical treatment?

While looking for information about the Luftwaffe hospital in Cherbourg, I came across the following post from Reddit. Some digging assured me that the photo is correctly captioned. Putting aside the fact that the Allies took women for POWs, do these nurses look like they’ve been working in a “squalid cesspool”?

Now, I’m sure the hospital wasn’t all candy and roses. It was wartime, after all, and Cherbourg was squarely within an active war zone. It was probably strained like any hospital in an active war zone. Spector uses vivid language to describe the facilities to distract the reader from the fact that Nazis took a Jew to a hospital in order to save his life. Sans any morbid characterization of these facilities, the reader might forget we’re supposed to believe that Nazis wanted to methodically exterminate all the Jews, not take measures to extend their lives. One such well-known measure was shaving the heads of the Jewish inmates in the camps. The populace has been led to believe through characterized Hollywood movies and high school reading material that it was a dehumanization tactic and not a life-saving measure to reduce the spread of lice that carry diseases like typhus. This is a point I have made often and won’t stop making: people that are reporting the truth do not need to twist facts like David Spector, and other Holocaust fabulists like him, do.

There is one more thing to cover in the New York Post article. When this news story about Baskind broke, Holocaust fabulists must have foreseen Holocaust revisionists raising alarm bells about these Jewish burial laws we’ve seen block so many past exhumations. For that problem, Spector included this fun little story:

But not only did Germany decline to grant permission, one of Jerusalem’s top clerics, Rabbi Osher Weiss, also would not sign off on the plan because there was no known precedent in Jewish law regarding exhuming and reburying partial remains.

…

But soon they caught a lucky break.

Two researchers at Yeshiva University uncovered an obscure opinion published in 1908 by a Hungarian rabbi that said it was permissible to exhume the foot of an amputee buried in a non-Jewish cemetery to rebury in a Jewish one.

Lamm and Rabbi Schacter brought the opinion to Rabbi Weiss to see if it applied to Baskind.

They were stunned to learn that the author of the ancient opinion, Rabbi Abraham Isaac Glick, was Rabbi Weiss’ great-great-grandfather.

Rabbi Weiss declared what Lamm and Rabbi Schacter had in mind for Baskind was, in fact, kosher.

Well, isn’t it convenient how there’s a ready-made excuse for violating Jewish law the second it becomes expedient for them. It’s called pilpul, and while it may have an elaborate definition within the Jewish community itself, what it essentially is is Jews conjuring up fanciful ways to skirt around their own laws. A humorous example of pilpul is Orthodox Jews inventing a Kosher lamp to get around being prohibited from operating electrical devices on Shabbat. Jews want to have it both ways, the laws must be adhered to when it benefits them, or they can be wormed out of when they become inconvenient.

Here’s an idea: let’s not let Jews have it either way. Just say no. No, Jew, we will not let the false narrative of the Holocaust hold us hostage any longer.