Robert Faurisson was a prominent French Holocaust revisionist who lived from 1929 to 2018. Despite being physically assaulted multiple times, Faurisson never gave up his convictions.
In 2002 revisionist Faurisson debated Holocaust defender, Mikkel Andersson (you can see Andersson’s now abandoned website here). This debate is an example of why orthodox Holocaust historians prefer dynamic silence over honest and open debate as things didn’t go very well for Andersson.
While I recommend that you listen to the entire debate I would like to highlight the discussion around mark 1:26:00. This is where Andersson says we know how the alleged homicidal gas chambers work from a convergence of evidence. When Faurisson asks him if it is evidence or testimony Andersson says he fails to see the distinction. This is important to note as the Holocaust narrative heavily relies on witness testimony due to the lack of physical evidence.
Check out the physical evidence tag to learn more about the lack of physical evidence.
Greetings
Just came across your information here which is a goldmine of information nicely and succinctly presented.
Not sure if you familiar with our work but I have probably the most videos presented on the internet on the Holocaust topic, so far 2600 videos on my site most relating to the topic.
You are providing a great service with your site here.
I don’t do any writing just video.
I will leave you with my main bitchute channel and a sampling of my work.
Auschwitz Camp 1 Tour
https://www.bitchute.com/video/dCtUqW7nt8fm/
Main site
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/kDHBE5vylTdI/
Jim Rizoli
Diane King
508-875-0835
I appreciate you. Keep up the good work. Also if you could, PDFs of key items and a download section to help spread the word. And make sure the last page has a link to your home page so when handed out people can lazily find your content.
Thank you 🙂