(This article was originally posted on October 24th, 2022. It has been updated with new information.)
This is what the Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum has to say about the alleged homicidal gas chambers in Birkenau:
The official claim is that the gas chambers in Birkenau could hold 2000 people at a time. In an interview Holocaust survivor and ex-Sonderkommando (Jewish inmate that allegedly helped the Germans murder other Jews), Dario Gabbai, goes so far as to say that they put 2,500 to 3,000 people in the chamber at a time.
The capacity of the alleged homicidal gas chambers is readily available. If you were to try and find the size of these alleged homicidal gas chambers through a simple search, however, you’re going to have a bad time. Try it yourself. Google ‘Auschwitz gas chamber size’ and see what you get. I was only able to find a link to the tweet below because I Googled ‘Auschwitz gas chamber 210 square meters’. It seems that you can only find the information if you already know it.
Why would the orthodox Holocaust website obfuscate such information? Perhaps it is because 210 square meters is 4/5 the size of a tennis court. The graphic below (courtesy of Dean Irebodd) shows us a visual representation of what 2000 people in a 210 square meter room looks like. Is it believable, is it conceivable, that Jews would allow the Sonderkommando to stuff them like sardines into a ‘shower room’?
Now you must imagine that 210 square meter room filled with 2000 people and add in four wire mesh columns (see image below). It is claimed that they introduced the Zyklon B pellets through these columns.
Next, imagine that these 2000 panicking people are being held back by a wooden door.
Finally, you must take into account that this feat was repeated over and over, day after day. Sometimes even more than once a day.
Do you believe these claims? If not people like anti-Semitism Envoy, Ambassador Deborah Lipstadt, would label you as an evil Holocaust definer. I don’t know about you, but I’d rather be a Holocaust denier then believe stupid things.
“Coalition-mindedness makes everyone, including scientists, far stupider in coalitional collectivities than as individuals. […] To question or disagree with coalitional precepts, even for rational reasons, makes one a bad and immoral coalition member —at risk of losing job offers, one’s friends, and one’s cherished group identity. This freezes belief revision.
Forming coalitions around scientific or factual questions is disastrous, because it pits our urge for scientific truth-seeking against the nearly insuperable human appetite to be a good coalition member. Once scientific propositions are moralized, the scientific process is wounded, often fatally. No one is behaving either ethically or scientifically who does not make the best case possible for rival theories with which one disagrees.” John Tooby “Coalitional instincts”, Edge.org
This is exactly what the jews have done when it comes to the Holocaust and racial questions in the West. What academia is claiming is stupid beyond belief and yet few dare speak up because of the fear of consequences. You are doing a fantastic job on this website. Keep it up!