Today’s article is inspired by a thread I stumbled upon while perusing the CoDoH forum.
A side effect of spreading false propaganda is that you run the risk of having your audience believing all manner of ridiculous things. When I was elementary school, I, too, believed that Hitler wanted to kill everyone who didn’t have blonde hair and blue eyes.
Young children are not the only ones to believe this story. Another user in the CoDoH forum linked to a Yahoo! Answers post on this topic that has since been taken down. Fortunately, it has been archived. “SniperBaby” asks why Hitler thought blonde hair and blue eyes were perfect. They also state that they don’t remember hearing an explanation yet they are still willing to believe it. This is the result of a lifetime of “Hitler bad” programming.
Disturbingly, none of the answers (that are still accessible) say that maybe the blonde/blue eyed thing could be a misconception. In the “favorite answer,” the user asserts that Mengele was obsessed with twins because Hitler wanted him to devise a way the German population could grow faster. Mengele’s answer? Find a way to make women to give birth to twins! Not only does someone actually believe this, but they typed it out for the world to see.
Falling further down the “things people believe about the Nazis” rabbit hole, I found the following Quora entry. 1.5 thousand people upvoted this incredibly pedestrian and incorrect take by “historian” Alex Mann. Accusing Hitler of wanting to conquer Europe is something they tell people that don’t know history to make them hate Hitler. Therefore to repeat it with such confidence shows that Alex Mann only has a superficial understanding of WW2 (or it is possible he is being malicious). Alex can get away with this lack of understanding because the people upvoting him also have a superficial understanding of WW2.
I’m going to employ Alex Mann’s Emperor Hadrian avatar as a segue into my last point even though it’s actually about Ancient Greece.
Another example of White history being distorted in a negative way is the charge that Ancient Greece was a homosexual paradise. I bring this up because I just found this video debunking this claim and because it is a piece of the same problem—that problem being the distortion of White European history for nefarious purposes.
The idea of a great civilization openly accepting homosexuality is used as a argument for allowing open homosexuality today. The Holocaust myth is used to paint the White people that would unite to work in their own racial self-interest as evil. To tackle and correct the misconceptions that serve to harm the spirit of White people is a daunting task, especially when you are up against the giants like mainstream media and academia. Do not despair. Despite all the propaganda, despite all the programming, despite all the censorship, there are still people out there who refuse to just listen and believe. The work of revisionists and the people spreading the truth is making a difference!
Holocaust revisionism has had little to no impact, look at Codoh a 20 year old forum with less than 10 active members. An echo chamber with a sole reliance on Mattogno. Once the remaining few “revisionists” have passed so will Holocaust revisionism.
All (apart from Germar) have a hard-on for Hitler, it’s why revisionism as a natural growth of knowledge is not considered serious as revisionism, but instead led by denialism acclaiming forgery on any and all documents being aligned into a global conspiracy. As shown in psychological studies of conspiracy theories, the bigger a conspiracy becomes as involving more people the less probability of such an alleged conspiracy theory of it being true.
Old-time revisionists came to dismiss their own works which newcomers are still consuming, take Cole and Hunt both openly dismiss their own works yet newcomers use as allegedly being in support. If the creators themselves are no longer convinced. see Topf and Sons Co, who had produced and modified on request the gas chambers and crematorium ovens, don’t forget the Criminal orders.
Why did the restrictions on the Jews from leaving German control end on October 18, 1941? see, The Origin of the Final Solution by Christopher Browning
Holocaust revisionism has no impact yet here you are commenting the same arguments on multiple posts. If it doesn’t matter why bother?
SHUT THE **** UP JEW
“Holocaust revisionism has had little to no impact…” Irrelevant, the only thing that matters is whether there is truth to debunking tired Jewish “holocaust” narratives, and the fact is that those narratives have changed constantly (rollercoasters, to lampshades, to ovens, etc.) over time based upon the truth of the research debunking them. Even the number (much “6 million” prophecy) has been shaken up by mainstream holocaust “scholars.”
“All (apart from Germar) have a hard-on for Hitler…” Irrelevant, prove German Rudolf, Carlo Mottagno, etc. wrong , or GTFO. Also, your “conspiracy theory” argument is meaningless, and instead of debunking those studies it’s just as good to say that billions of dollars propping up the holocaust industry doesn’t make it true, only the truth would (and it doesn’t).
“Old-time revisionists came to dismiss their own works …” Because the Goliath of Jewish financial and judicial interests abuse, bully, threaten, and suppress them to the point that they just want their lives back. Cole literally had a bounty put on his head to be assassinated. Just like how the Nazi “testimonies” came from them being tortured with jumper-cables to their privates. The oppression by Jewish interests is sick, malignant, and comprehensive.
Chris Browning has been debunked and the rest of what you cite is hearsay and unsubstantiated by any English records. Anyone can point to German companies, docs, etc. and pretend they say something that fits the narrative.
More and more people are learning about the deception everyday. The truth will out against this treacherous Jewish blood libel against Whites and their countries.
Well said.
No more than 4 posts.
My reply was in response to your ending statements acclaiming that “Holocaust revisionism” is on the rise. No chance, the scene has never been so void–while the original people have since passed and the few remaining have dismissed and moved on. (Weber, Cole, Hunt, Irving, Lindtner) etc.
Yes, Holocaust revisionism is a lost cause, 60+ years and what exists? Codoh, the active members would fit around a small table and have enough space for others to join-in and listen to how the latest claim and document are according to Mattogno a forgery. Just because he says so.
When so-called revisionists fall back on the same few people’s opinions you know your dealing with a cult. Codoh itself thought controls topics-per thread so as to limit any discussion. Otherwise Hannover aka the “Moderator” signs out/logs back in to censor and ban, resulting in the existing dead discussion board.
My last post, pull up the criminal orders. Try not to get stuck into an echo chamber by already starting off with a fixed narrative that you only aim to confirm. Just see how all the members of Codoh are unwilling to critique Hitler on anything which should clearly show you of their objectivity.
I never actually said Holocaust revisionism is on the rise. I said we are making a difference. If we weren’t Canada wouldn’t have bothered to add themselves to the list of countries were denial is illegal. Germany wouldn’t have bothered to arrest Ursula Haverbeck, who is 93. The ADL wouldn’t have pressured major social media platforms to censor us. People like you wouldn’t be arguing in the comments of a Revisionist site run by one woman.
Holocaust revisionism isn’t exactly lucrative work. In countries where it is not illegal to question the Holocaust you are still met with institutional persecution and censorship. You can never know the true motivations of the people you mentioned. It is possible that they left revisionism simply because they couldn’t handle it anymore.
The CoDoH forum does not represent the extent of Holocaust revisionism. Where people are allowed to talk about it they do. Just because you haven’t seen it doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.
You do realize that no more revisionists are given access to the archives and that is why we must rely on those that did. But you wouldn’t want to mention that if you did because it looks bad that the Holocaust affirmers only allow people in their camp to study these materials.
I have already addressed your criminal orders charge. The orders are nothing outside of reasonable for a country to do during wartime. They do not offer evidence of a genocide.
bahahaha you have a dedicated kike commenter already nice
With respect to that Greek video, I have no dog in the debate. In essence I think it has minimal impact on modern discourse. Here is a response video to it by Joseph Bronski (not Jewish fwiw)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMs4ijjWA60
Here is a debate on the topic with Bronski and Aarvoll
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vItMJI5aWrQ
I am not educated in this topic enough to comment, other than saying I found Bronski’s arguments more convincing.