Part 1, Part 2, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7
This meme is going down.

I left off with the following excerpt from Wikipedia in part two. They claim that Goebbels dairies provides evidence for the Holocaust because they contained copies of the Wannsee Conference protocols. Thing is the Wannsee protocols are actually evidence of a plan to remove Jews through forced deportations, not genocide. As for the Goebbels diary entry from March 27, 1942 you can read about how liquidate in this context does not mean exterminate in this thread from the CoDoH forum.

Wannsee Conference: This is a topic that I have previously covered, you can read it here. What Holocaust promoters rely on is that you will never actually read this document. And if you do read it they hope that your Holocaust indoctrination compels you to believe that ‘final solution’ means extermination, even though the context says nothing about extermination. Considering the following from my article:
If you haven’t done so already I encourage you to read the document for yourself. It can be found here on the website of the Jewish Virtual Library. The translation was for use at the Nuremberg trials, so you know it was done with the harshest language possible. Despite this there is nothing in the document that corroborates with the narrative that Jews were systematically murdered in homicidal gas chambers.
Korherr Report: The following is the Wikipedia entry for the Korherr Report. Notice all the quotations used, “processed”, “already evacuated”, “special treatment”. So we can see that using this document for evidence of a genocide relies on the premise that the Nazis used code words. In order to bolster this claim of code words Wikipedia asserts that Himmler had Korherr replace “special treatment” with “processed”. However, the source given for this claim has no citation or proof of this assertion.
That source is helpful in the fact that it contains a transcript of the report. Above Wikipedia stated, “Commissioned by Himmler, Korherr calculated that, from 1937 to December 1942, the number of Jews in Europe had fallen by 4 million.” Below is the portion of the document where this is reported and Korherr gives the reasons (which Wikipedia omitted). Notice how there is nothing about murdering them in homicidal gas chambers.
Orthodox Holocaust historians would have you believe that evacuations means exterminations. However they have no proof for this. Carlo Mattogno’s book, The Einsatzgruppen in the Occupied Eastern Territories—Genesis, Missions and Actions talks about the Korherr report on pages 246-250. Mattogno analyzes the claims and the numbers and comes up the conclusion that one cannot consider all the “evacuations” to be “killings” because that would mean that nearly 55,000 registered Jews in Auschwitz would have had to been killed before being even arriving at Auschwitz. The more one looks into this document the more it becomes apparent that the bit about the code words is a just-so story to make these documents fit in with the official narrative.
Enough with the documents, what about the ‘physical evidence’ mentioned in the meme? Read part four to find out!
I sneed
To see the Wannsee Protokoll as a plan to exterminate Jews depends almost entirely on accepting the word Endlösung as a euphemism for mass murder, per the (more or less dogmatic) claim that this is what happened later — reasonably intelligent, fair people will note the circularity: Endlösung means extermination because extermination is what happened later, and because the Germans tried to exterminate the Jews, use of Endlösung in the Wannsee Protokoll means extermination.
Here is what I will accept as an accurate transcription of the German text:
https://eudocs.lib.byu.edu/index.php/Wannsee-Protokoll
Speaking of previous measures taken to address the Judenfrage, it says: ‘Das Aufgabenziel war, auf legale Weise den deutschen Lebensraum von Juden zu säubern.’
This means: The goal of these previous steps was to legally remove Jews from German areas.
Obviously murder was not legal — so it’s more reasonable to see the Wannseekonferenz as a continuation of this process: to decide on further legal measures to be taken to remove Jews from German areas — in this view, Endlösung just means an answer to the question: What are we finally going to do, meaning the detailed measures, to accomplish the goal of removing the Jews from German living areas?