Filip Müller is a well known and fondly remembered ex-Sonderkommando of the Holocaust. Sonderkommando being a Jew that allegedly assisted the Germans in murdering other Jews.
I have written about Müller and his story of eating poppy seed cake in the gas chamber before. I have also previously mentioned how Raul Hilberg in his definitive text on the Holocaust, The Destruction of the European Jews, cited unreliable witness testimony. Hilberg is not shy about quoting Müller as he does it no less than 20 times.
Let’s look at some of Müller’s claims. This absurdity needs no commentary.
In the following passage Müller must be recounting a gassing that didn’t have 2000 people as there would have been no room for running about. What’s most telling about Müller’s reliability as a witness is the description of the dead bodies being blue. This is because cyanide poisoning causes the skin to become cherry red, not blue (read this article for more on that topic).
Next we have a claim that Müller shares with Henryk Tauber, whom I have written about. That is the claim of collecting human fat in order to use it as fuel to burn bodies. This could not happen unless the bodies were protected from the open flames otherwise the heat of the fire would cause the fat to combust. And if they for some reason were burning the bodies in giant pans the fat would not be collected in a channel at the bottom of a pit. This leads one to wonder if Müller was giving witness testimony or telling spooky stories.
When judging the validity of these stories it’s important to keep these things in mind:
Do you think Raul Hilberg and other orthodox Holocaust historians followed this criteria for determining credibility when they cited or quoted witnesses such as Filip Müller? I’m thinking he didn’t. All that mattered was if he could use the testimony to support the official narrative of the Holocaust.
If you’d like to read more witness testimonies check out Jürgen Graf’s, Auschwitz: Eyewitness Reports and Perpetrator Confessions of the Holocaust—30 Gas-Chamber Witnesses Scrutinized.
“What does Müller say that’s crazy?” – History Tweets
😂
All of this reminds me of the Theodore Dalrymple quote about likening political correctness to communist propaganda:
Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small. In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to.
Oftentimes it seems the same is true of these ‘survivor’ tales: their absurdity is designed to psychologically subjugate and humiliate the goyim.
And how dumb could the Germans be?! — allowing so many ‘Sonderkommando’ members to survive and tell their stories.
Do you think Raul Hilberg and other orthodox Holocaust historians followed this criteria for determining credibility when they cited or quoted witnesses such as Filip Müller?
You just need to have and use basic common sense — to me, the most eye-opening part of the well-known video One Third of the Holocaust was the first part, which exposes the shoddiness of the sources used by Hilberg, who was himself revealed to be a fraud at the first Zündel trial, where he was embarrassed on the witness stand when subjected to cross-examination by Doug Christie — this is one reason I think the name of the website Holocaust Denial on Trial is ridiculous.
Most people are familiar with the concept of suspension of disbelief, meaning to get involved and enjoy some tale you have to willingly suspend your skepticism that something like that is possible, e.g. Star Trek (faster than light travel etc) — it’s the same for the ‘Holocaust’ — to believe the extermination story you have to set aside any critical thinking — I suppose the moral pressure to believe the story helps with that.